Unfortunately, you have to have a paid or premium account, but yes!
The definition I settled on was that I actively wanted to engage with it in more than a once-off experimental way (i.e. something I felt I could plausbly write for an exchange, for example). This is, of course, complicated by the fact that there are things I ship that I avoid fandom content about because I disagree with/dislike the most common interpretation of it in fandom, but I think that by including "just thinking about it" or even, like, re-visiting canon for that ship (either in part of in whole), in my definition of "engaging with" a ship allows for that. There are also ships that I think are nice and that I do think should happen in canon, but that I don't feel I ship. It's a deceptively simple question with a lot of potential complex answers really!
no subject
Date: 2023-01-26 11:03 pm (UTC)The definition I settled on was that I actively wanted to engage with it in more than a once-off experimental way (i.e. something I felt I could plausbly write for an exchange, for example). This is, of course, complicated by the fact that there are things I ship that I avoid fandom content about because I disagree with/dislike the most common interpretation of it in fandom, but I think that by including "just thinking about it" or even, like, re-visiting canon for that ship (either in part of in whole), in my definition of "engaging with" a ship allows for that. There are also ships that I think are nice and that I do think should happen in canon, but that I don't feel I ship. It's a deceptively simple question with a lot of potential complex answers really!